A security officer at 555 California Street in San Francisco is reported to have threatened to assault a photographer and break his camera for taking a picture of the building from a public sidewalk. Story Here

According to the photographer:

within a few moments several security guards greeted us with wagging fingers and walkie-talkies.

No photography, they stated clearly. Why, we responded. Safety, they said.

I decided to challenge this statement and the older of the bunch (left) asked me if I wanted to be punched in the face. No, I replied, I have to go back to work and a black eye would make things awkward for me. He then asked me how I would feel if he broke my camera. I told him I would be bummed, but that I needed an upgrade and if he touched me or my camera I would seek monetary legal action to the extent of a brand new Canon 5D Mark II.

A security guard who threatens anyone in such a manner should be investigated and fired. His behavior is inexcusable under any circumstances.

Before I get comments from private property advocates who will try to say that the photographers may have been standing on the publicly accessible area behind the legal property line demarcated by a sidewalk plaque; California Civil code states:

“After taking any of the actions set forth in paragraph (1), (2), or (3), and during the time such action is effective, the owner shall not prevent any public use which is appropriate under the permission granted pursuant to such paragraphs by physical obstruction, notice, or otherwise.” Restricting photography from the plaza in front of 555 California violates the public use clause in California Civil Code 1009.

2 Responses to “Security At 555 California St, San Francisco, Threatens Photographer”

  • Charles U Farley says:

    The dictionary defines safety as: “The condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger, risk, or injury.”

    So, if safety is our concern, then perhaps the company needs to fire these guards who threaten to injure photographers and destroy their equipment. Obviously there is more risk to safety from the power hungry door-rattlers than from photography.

    If you are interested in contacting the company about this, here are the contacts I was able to find:

    FATIMA VEGAS
    General Manager
    fvegas@vno.com

    DIANA ROSENBLATT
    Property Manager
    drosenblatt@vno.com

    JERICHO NEIBERT
    Assistant Property Manager
    jneibert@vno.com

    STEVEN ROTH
    Chairman of the Board
    sroth@vno.com

    MICHAEL FASCITELLI
    President, CEO and Trustee
    mfascitelli@vno.com

    LAWRENCE FRANCIS
    Director of Security Services
    lfrancis@vno.com

    24 hour number to security at 555 California St.
    (415) 391-8212

  • mepsipax says:

    What a pathetic reply. I wonder if the security guards will really be disciplined. This is a private organization and will respond to public outcry better than most police departments.

Powered by WebRing.
Visit our Forums
Have a story to share that we did not cover? Want to discuss something in greater detail? Want to compare Nikon vs. Canon? Post it in our forum - all are welcome.

Click Here

    follow me on Twitter