<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metropolitan Police (London) Clarify Photo Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nycphotorights.com/2009/07/metropolitan-police-london-clarify-photo-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nycphotorights.com/2009/07/metropolitan-police-london-clarify-photo-rules/</link>
	<description>Photographers are harassed daily.. Read the horror stories here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.nycphotorights.com/2009/07/metropolitan-police-london-clarify-photo-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nycphotorights.com/?p=695#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Still problematic (and interesting) are the differences from our rights here in the U.S. -- for example, the power of the police to compel a photographer to show his images (how do they deal with film?), and the ability to seize without warrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still problematic (and interesting) are the differences from our rights here in the U.S. &#8212; for example, the power of the police to compel a photographer to show his images (how do they deal with film?), and the ability to seize without warrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santa</title>
		<link>http://www.nycphotorights.com/2009/07/metropolitan-police-london-clarify-photo-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>santa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nycphotorights.com/?p=695#comment-435</guid>
		<description>this is an important development for photographers. it&#039;s because of web sites like this along with the publicity generated by people asserting their rights that these clarifications were made. hopefully this will save some poor soul with a camera the hassle and indignation of a verbal assault in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is an important development for photographers. it&#8217;s because of web sites like this along with the publicity generated by people asserting their rights that these clarifications were made. hopefully this will save some poor soul with a camera the hassle and indignation of a verbal assault in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
